翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Civilization Revolution
・ Civilization Revolution 2
・ Civilization V
・ Civilization World
・ Civilizations in Babylon 5
・ Civilized (album)
・ Civilized core
・ Civilized Evil
・ Civilized Man
・ Civilizing mission
・ Civilizing the Economy
・ Civilla D. Martin
・ CivilWarLand in Bad Decline
・ Civiløkonom
・ Civil–military administrations (Ukraine)
Civil–military relations
・ Civil–military relations during the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan government
・ Civionics
・ Civis
・ Civis (surname)
・ Civis Center Timișoara
・ Civis media prize
・ Civis romanus sum
・ Civish
・ Civita
・ Civita (Cascia)
・ Civita (disambiguation)
・ Civita (San Diego, California)
・ Civita (surname)
・ Civita Castellana


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Civil–military relations : ウィキペディア英語版
Civil–military relations

Civil–military relations (Civ-Mil or CMR) describes the relationship between civil society as a whole and the military organization or organizations established to protect it. More narrowly, it describes the relationship between the civil authority of a given society and its military authority. Studies of civil-military relations often rest on a normative assumption that civilian control of the military is preferable to military control of the state. The principal problem they examine, however, is empirical: to explain how civilian control over the military is established and maintained.〔James Burk. 2002. "Theories of Democratic Civil-Military Relations." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 29(1): 7–29.〕
While generally not considered a separate academic area of study in and of itself, it involves scholars and practitioners from many fields and specialties. Apart from political science and sociology, Civ-Mil (CMR) draws upon such diverse fields as law, philosophy, area studies, psychology, cultural studies, anthropology, economics, history, diplomatic history, journalism, and the military, among others. It involves study and discussion of a diverse range of issues including but not limited to: civilian control of the military, military professionalism, war, civil-military operations, military institutions, and other related subjects. International in scope, civil-military relations involves discussion and research from across the world. The theoretical discussion can include non-state actors〔Robert Mandel. 2004. "The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 30(2): 171–201.〕〔Robert Mandel. 2007. Reassessing Victory in Warfare. ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 33(4): 461–495.〕 as well as more traditional nation-states. Other research involves discerning the details of military political attitudes, voting behavior,〔Donald S. Inbody. 2015. (Soldier Vote: War, Politics, and the Ballot in America.'' New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. )〕〔Donald S. Inbody. 2008. "Partisanship and the Military." in ''Inside Defense: Understanding the U.S. Military in the 21st Century''. Derek S. Reveron and Judith Hicks Stiehm (eds). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.〕〔Donald S. Inbody. 2009. (''Grand Army of the Republic or Grand Army of the Republicans? Political Party and Ideological Preferences of American Enlisted Personnel )''.〕 and the potential impact on and interaction with democratic society〔Morris Janowitz. 1982. "Consequences of Social Science Research on the U.S. Military." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 8(4): 507–524.〕〔Peter D. Feaver and Richard H. Kohn, (Eds.) 2001. ''Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security''. Cambridge: MIT Press.〕 as well as military families.〔Jere Cohen and Mady Wechsler Segal. 2009. "Veterans, the Vietnam Era, and Marital Dissolution: An Event History Analysis." ''(''Armed Forces & Society'' )''. .〕〔Brian J. Reed and David R. Segal. 2000. "The Impact of Multiple Deployments on Soldiers' Peacekeeping Attitudes, Morale, and Retention." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 27(1): 57–78.〕〔Richard T. Cooney, Jr., Mady Wechsler Segal, David R. Segal and William W. Falk. 2003. "Racial Differences in the Impact of Military Service on the Socioeconomic Status of Women Veterans." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 30(1): 53.85.〕〔David R. Segal and Morten G. Ender. 2008. "Sociology in Military Officer Education." ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 35(1): 3–15.〕
==History==

The history of civil-military relations can be traced to the writings of Sun Tzu〔Sun Tzu. 1971. ''The Art of War''. Oxford: Oxford University Press.〕 and Carl von Clausewitz,〔Carl von Clausewitz. 1989. ''On War''. Princeton: Princeton University Press.〕 both of whom argued that military organizations were primarily the servants of the state.
Concerns about a growing militarism in society, largely coming from the experiences of the first half of the twentieth century, engendered an examination into the impact of military organizations within society.〔Alfred Vagts. 1937. ''A History of Militarism: A Romance and Realities of a Profession''. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.〕〔Pearl S. Buck, et al. 1949. "New Evidence of the Militarization of America." National Council Against Conscription.〕
The ramifications of the Cold War, specifically the American decision to maintain a large standing army for the first time in its history, led to concerns about whether such a large military structure could be effectively maintained by a liberal democracy. Samuel P. Huntington and Morris Janowitz published the seminal books on the subject which effectively brought civil-military relations into academia, particularly in political science and sociology.〔Samuel P. Huntington. 1957. ''The Soldier and the State; the Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations''. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.〕〔Morris Janowitz. 1960. ''The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait''. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.〕 Despite the peculiarly American impetus for Huntington's and Janowitz's writing, their theoretical arguments are often used in the study of other national civil-military studies. However, in his book ''The Man on Horseback'', Samuel E. Finer countered some of Huntington's arguments and assumptions, and offered a look into the civil-military relationships in the under-developed world. Finer observed that many governments do not have the administrative skills to efficiently govern which may open opportunities for military intervention—opportunities that are not as likely in more developed countries.〔Samuel E. Finer. 1988. ''The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics''. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.〕
The increased incidence of military coups d'état since World War II, particularly in the 1960s and 1970s, brought about a growing interest in academic and journalistic circles in studying the nature of such coups. Political upheaval in Africa led to military take-overs in Dahomey, Togo, Congo, and Uganda, to mention just a few.〔Samuel Decalo. 1976. ''Coups and Army Rule in Africa: Studies in Military Style''. New Haven: Yale University Press.〕 Political unrest in South America, which involved military coups in Bolivia (189 military coups in its first 169 years of existence), Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay, was largely a result of forces attempting to stem the increasing influence of left-wing and communist led uprisings.〔Charles F. Andrain. 1994. ''Comparative Political Systems: Policy Performance and Social Change''. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.〕 The 2006 military coup in Thailand engendered continued interest in this area.〔Mark Beeson. 2008. "Civil-Military Relations in Indonesia and the Philippines: Will the Thai Coup Prove Contagious?" ''(Armed Forces & Society )''. 34(3): 474–490.〕
The end of the Cold War led to new debate about to the proper role of the military in society, both in the United States and in the former Soviet Union. However, as before, much of the discussion revolved around whether the power of the state was in decline and whether an appropriate level of civilian control was being brought to bear on the military.〔Michael C. Desch. 1998. "Soldiers, States, and Structures: The End of the Cold War and Weakening U.S. Civilian Control." Armed Forces & Society. 24(3): 389–405.〕〔Michael C. Desch. 2001. ''Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment''. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.〕〔Bartholomew H. Sparrow and Donald S. Inbody. 2005. ''(Supporting Our Troops? U. S. Civil-Military Relations in the Twenty-first Century )''. Prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C. (September).〕〔K.E. Sorokin. 1993. "Conversion in Russia: The Need for a Balanced Strategy." ''(Journal of Political and Military Sociology )''. 12(2): 163–179.〕〔Dale Herspring. 2009. "Civil-Military Relations in the United States and Russia: An Alternative Approach." (''Armed Forces & Society'' ). 35(4):667.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Civil–military relations」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.